Sonica 2007: the third installment of the annual Italian psytrance festival. Held in mountain pine woodland in Liguria between La Spezia and Genoa 1000 metres above sea level close to the famed Cinque Terre National Park, this was a truly remarkable location with spectacular views of the Vara Valley. Here, when wheeling one’s head to the heavens from the Main Stage, you copped a face full of sky. The event featured one of the better line-ups of the European summer season: with standout performances from a range of artists including the masterful Frank E from Koxbox, the haunting melody-lines of Silicon Sound’s puppet master Johannes Regnier, along with James Munro and the sensational Elfi pizza collective. Perhaps 5000 mostly Italians turned out for this sky-high romper stomper not far from the Riviera. As Didac, a Spanish Obelix t-shirt wearing and Getafix drinking camp-mate, confirmed: “these Romans are crazy!”
Upgrade to the Longer Now
But wait, is that a Bouncy Castle right there in the middle of the festival? No, its Club Duracell. Officially known as the Duracell Powerhouse (and on its European “Power Up” tour), this is an air-inflated tent shaped like a long-life Duracell battery pitched mid-festival. With a sound system, smoke machine and dance club atmosphere inside, the Battery featured a full line-up of DJs whose set-times were listed in the Sonica booklet alongside the artists performing on the Main and Alternative stages.
Enticing young people all over Europe with the prospect of swapping their “tired batteries” for “shiny new Duracell Ultra M3s”, hustling brand loyalty and reinforcing a perma-cycle of disposability, Duracell offer festival participants a “free battery exchange.” I’m not sure what was more inflated: the tent or Sonica’s claims to be “in regard of the environment and for the use of renewable energies”.
The line comes from the promotional literature for this “Celebrating Nature” edition of the festival. Sonica appeared to have responded to past criticisms and the special requirements of the venue with their solar powered shower and lighting, some apparent investment in a “carbon sink” re-forestation program in Costa Rica, separate garbage bags for recyclable waste and cigarette butt containers, and efforts by green t-shirt wearing “eco-team” volunteers to “reduce the negative impact of human activity on the ecosystem.” But with the Duracell Powerhouse “partying into the early hours, making the music last longer, much longer” (from it’s website), is this appropriation of environmental virtue – now commonly practiced by businesses globally as “greenwashing” - justified? Can we take any of this stuff seriously?
What are the costs of making now last longer? Self-identifying as the “leading brand of batteries globally”, Duracell are among the chief manufacturers of (non-rechargeable and non-recyclable) alkaline batteries, classified as hazardous waste (potentially leaking harmful potassium hydroxide) in many parts of the world. They are a transnational corporation promoting lifestyle and energy usage practices that are inherently unsustainable, albeit “longer lasting”. With its unsustainable promise of sustainability, Duracell leaves a massive footprint given that the manufacture and use of its primary product is tied to non-renewable energy consumption, disposability and pollution. So what are we make of this bloated icon of disposability powering up and broadsiding Sonica's “neo-tribal” Duende Village, an arena for presentations, workshops and films promoting an “eco-sustainable future”? According to its initiators, Duende is “a mysterious and indescribable force, a creative fire similar to the vital lymph that courses through the roots of human sensibility, feeding the collective imagination with dreams of utopia and a better world.” Dreaming about utopia and a better world while ecologically unsound agents of the old world snore gruffly down the back of your neck requires a set of quality moulded earplugs; not to mention a strong disposition to endure this chicanery.
Then there's the nearby Healing area featuring shiatsu, ayurvedic massage, crystal healing,
reiki and aura imaging (with a sweatlodge out the back).
Out the front, squaring-off upon some kind of karmic battleground, a Javanese-style stone meditating Buddha’s head faced down the swollen copper-top. And what should we infer from signs hanging along a wooded path to the Main Stage presumably painted by those working for Sonica: “Leave no Trace” and “Another World is Possible”? Apparently it amounts to outrageous hypocrisy and probably goes someway towards explaining why I felt cheated, powerless, deflated, each time I wandered past the Duracell Sweatlodge, an exasperation common among many participants I met.In a period which has seen the flourishing of rechargeable alternatives in a range of devices from digital media players to palm top computers and cell phones, and given the emergence of self-powered (i.e. shakelights, dynamos, solar powered) flashlights, radios etc (Duracell now also market their own cranklights), it appears that a light has cranked on inside Duracell’s advertising and promotions brainstrust undoubtedly responding to the mounting danger of obsolescence… Ten years from now this picture might appear more ludicrous than it does even now:
Energy Sacrifice & The Party
Festivals of varying stripes offer an intriguing lens on consumer practices (and profit making), as they also provide witness to the necessity for profitless or directionless consumption. As Georges Bataille (following the excellent work of Frank Gauthier in the collection Rave Culture and Religion) discussed in relation to sacrifice:
"The meaning of this profound freedom is given in destruction, whose essence is to consume profitlessly whatever might remain in the progression of useful works. Sacrifice destroys that which it consecrates … This useless consumption is what suits me, once my concern for the morrow is removed. And if I thus consume immoderately, I reveal to my fellow beings that which I am intimately: Consumption is the way in which separate beings communicate. Everything shows through, everything is open and infinite between those who consume intensely.”
As any follower of Bataille might inform us, dance parties are natural sites of excess, for an experientially intense consumption of excess “energy”, the orchestration and performance of wild abandon, for the burning up in potlatch-like proportions that which had been translated as society’s “accursed share”. As a fellow Australian I met on the edge of the Main Floor holding a plastic bottle containing a mixture of absinthe and something unknown encouraged me: “go ahead and have yourself a party”. What are the implications for preventing or suppressing such intensive moments of mass consumption as the all-night trance festival or any of its equivalents, from subcultural revelries to more accepted social wingdings rippling across contemporary cultures participants in which periodically rally to spend themselves in sometimes outrageous derangements? What is the consequence of conserving such energies, of preventing the expression of desires for radical otherness, of merging with the Other, and thus the sacred, in ecstatic moments when one is literally outside of one’s Self in the presence of others?
In their freakish extremes, their voguish edgework and their outlandish vibe, it is perhaps these habitués of the psytrance festival and events similar who embody an answer. Unravelling their Selves amid passionate gesticulations illuminated by turbulent fire staffs, glow poi and an array of advanced lighting, and with the aid of a growing platter of psychoactive chemicals and “shamanic” herbs; modifying their bodies in simple or baroque tattoo designs evoking mystery, nature and gothic struggles, combating entropy with lobe scalpelling, staplings, dermal anchors and flesh pockets; becoming locked in nocturnal têt'à têtes with punishing Kindzadza-style dark-psy or horrortrance at 165+bpm, surfing the devil’s frequency down the front of the stacks; sonic riders seeking the perfect rave, addicted to vertigo, driven to madness. These are contexts for epic derailments of the mind, and violent interventions upon the body, which sometimes, given most unfortunate circumstances, might even be fatal: a local man died of an alleged overdose of atropine cut cocaine at Sonica 07. But in a Bataillian general economy, without these, and less extreme states of embodiment and out-of-body-ment, there might never be community, but instead, in the extreme, the state controlled sacrificial catastrophe of perma-war. In this logic, the wider implications for the repression, domestication and privatisation of Carnival and ekstasis in the contemporary United States, as for example recently documented by Barbara Ehrenreich in her Dancing in the Streets: A History of Collective Joy (a good idea though questionable scholarship), are considerable, disastrous even.
Since these events are periodic, often seasonal, we might call psytrance festivals or any of their equivalents within electronic dance music culture, moments through which human communities are recharged; investments in renewable culture and identity, made renewable through collective acts of becoming “wasted”, “losing it”, getting “trashed”, going “out there”; sacrificial contexts through which the organic need for luxury have evolved. In this way, the non-productive expenditure of one’s self through lavish self-abandonment and limit-pushing ventures is productive, even if only of equilibrium and peace. But this is not the romanticised “collective effervescence” made famous through Emile Durkheim’s armchair anthropology - which now appears to be a term better approximating the sound caused as two or more cans of Fanta are cracked open - but a theory of excess which recognises the value of waste, of transgression, sacrifice, advanced munterment: the apocalypse of subjectivity. Though this is not to suggest that these aren’t intimately related to questions of revitalisation or redress in any observations of the sacred margins: their orgiastic convulsions, their mystical potency. From the perspective of deckchair or beanbag anthropology, if the aroma of a five-day dance floor adds anything to this discussion, perhaps “collective putrescence” might be a more apt description.
From the perspective of most contributions to the collection on Australian techno countercultures, FreeNRG: Notes From the Edge of the Dance Floor (downloaded from that link @ Undergrowth), the “energy” gifted in the form of resources, art, skills and time, to produce the free dance party “doof”, along with the exhaustive expenditure of energy on the dance floor, amounts to festal sacrifice essential for the reproduction of variant alternative techno-tribes. This gifting (i.e. voluntary labour, donated equipment, skillsharing, communal meals etc) to reproduce the party space operates within an alternative economy associated with a co-operative sensibility and whose countercultural ethos is integral to the visionary culture within which psytrance has evolved. Crucially these music and dance cultures demonstrate commitments to the celebration and defence of nature: a desire to reconcile with and protect the natural world considered sacred and enchanting. But FreeNRG is several removes from Sonica whose patrons demand optimised modes of luxury and expenditure and whose organisers operate without the slightest hint of embarrassment otherwise generated by their own duplicity.
The celebration of abandonment and energy consumption, as any decent festal moment might be defined, appears to have been taken literally by Sonica, whose operators accepted sponsorship and on-site marketing from a corporation whose product competes with claims towards "celebrating nature." And thus competes with the countercultural legacy of psytrance, its culture and festivals, the social aesthetic of which traditionally seeks freedom, not without contradiction, from prevailing practices of rapacious materialism laying waste to the planet. This alternative vibe is under perennial strain as it struggles to assert an identity against that which it seeks freedom from (i.e. corporate greed, ecological destruction, prejudice). And this negative aesthetic is in dispute with the directionless opening towards oblivion otherwise prevailing, the erotic impulse for discontinuity, discharge, bliss, which cares little for what happens after the orgy.
While beat freaks surrender to the pounding rhythms predominating, they are, at the same time, resistant to the consensus trance, sceptical of official culture, committed to modes of consumer opposition: an acute ecstatic/activist paradox defining identity. Given preoccupations with ecological and humanitarian crises downstream from radical forebears and “tomorrow people”, many psytrance habitués demonstrate a mounting apprehension for what transpires “on the morrow”, their disenchantment with conditions derivative of over-consumption conflicting with the desire for sacrificial consumption in the general economic logic of Bataille; their party and lifestyle also the vehicle, through drama, pedagogy and technique, for an alternative world.
Alternative lifestyle and consumer practices – including the increased popularity of self-powered flashlights - render these events a specifically resistant register. Which begs one to ask: What’s cranking in Italy?
Thanks to Susanne Riemann for some photos used here.
8 comments:
That Duracell tent is high irony. Undoubtedly Duracell offered the festival much needed funding. I'm not sure the festival is guilty of hypocrisy; from what is described here the organisers did try to do what could be done. Ravers are notorious for leaving their TAZs in states of utter devastation & waste, so hypocrisy extends as far as the individual who tramples the earth, tosses their trash, and even drives to the party. That said, the Duracell tent reminds me of similar tents at SONAR festival in Barcelona, especially the 'Lucky Strike Girls' -- cute young women giving away free cigarettes -- in 2004. The year later SONAR featured a 'female photographer' for their promotions; even when behind the lens, the female body was the centre of the (male) gaze. (And what any of this had to do with a music festival, I will never know...). Point being, this kind of corporate sponsorship at European electronic music festivals is quite ingrained.
The key point I'm making here is that sponsorship from Duracell (and the dance tent) competed with the festival's primary theme - "celebrating nature" - especially given that Duracell were pushing their new line of non-rechargeable/non-recyclable batteries, despite the other efforts by Sonica. In the context of EDM festivals this kind of sponsorship and endorsement is not surprising (the Duracell Powerhouse is after all travelling a festival circuit), but it becomes particularly hypocritical, and farcical, in this context, given the evolution of psy-trance festivals and their counter-cultural / alternative spiritual reputation. No doubt Sonica benefited from the extra money to fund what was one of the better trance lineups this European summer, but club duracell was popularly received at an event with green pretentions.
I should have said - not popularly received
Thank you for the productive input. From a more subjective point of view I would like to add that the Duracell tent did not only look out of place. It was also set up in the perfect spot to guarantee that those daytime dancers who had travelled all the way to Italy to hear one of the better psychedelic European line-ups would be kept from sleeping by the skilled use of crystal clear progressive club sound every night.
I talked to one of the guys working for the promotion tour. He said that they had actually planned to attend another festival in Italy, but either the festival or their participation was cancelled, not sure about that. Anyway, it seems that they were looking for a new partner and found Sonica.
A thought on the eco-concept: How about avoiding garbage instead of seperating? Tons of green bags would have been saved if reusable plastic cups had been used at the bar ...
Ei, Graham!! What's up! It was a long time I read Sonica's experience in your blogg. Sorry about sending my point of view one month and a have after we spent such a nice time back in Luguria... despite of Duracell!! There's no much to add about. I understand the pseu-ecological point of view of some of the commnets, when they said "Ravers leave all the shit on the ground". But, that is not enough to justify Duracell humoungus battery right in the middle of the festival. That, it's called "Propaganda", and it has nothing to do with nature. Whether we like or not, it became Duracell festival. No dubt about it. By the way: did Duracell worry about where I was going to throw their non-rechargeable batteries after using them? Who cares!
It's about principles. It's just it cannot be that way. It's as hipocritical as US Army giving founds to rebuilt hospitals in Irak. What's this shit about!Fucken bastards!Same for Duracell. The question is simple: What are you doing here, Duracell? Are you on sale?
Ciao, bello!! Keep on touch!!
Didac
Didac, I think it is a bit hypocritical to say you disagree with everything Duracell, yet then say that you did get batteries from them. I agree the tent was too big and didn't fit the style of the festival, but at least they recycled the batteries that were handed in, and you may criticise the use of batteries but then you still use them, as we all do.
Hey Didac! I think your experience only demonstrates how successful these marketing campaigns are when they make an offer you just cant refuse. That is, if you dont really know any better. The organisers of the "Celebrating Nature" edition of Sonica, should have known better.
See you on the road!
Ey, dues!! I'm sorry about the lateness of my answer but I never expected any comment about mine so never took a look again in Sonica's Graham blogg. By the way, I want to apologie about my english: feel sorry about it. It's a long time not practicing at all. Well, let's get on the point. You're quite right Anonymous but I can explain easyly my "hypocritical" act just to make you understand it's not. The day I got my batteries I went first to a little town with a friend in order to buy some whisky, groseries and brand new batteries (I still had the ones that came with the camera and, obviusly, they were not rechargeable). I was going to choose my batteries when here he comes my friend with an outstanding question: why are you going to spend money that I could save? Good question! Beyond humor, getting new batteries in "Duracell inflated castell" is not being hypocritical for one little fact: Duracell will continue setting up its Castell eventhough not even one person from Sonica -neither other festivals where they were-would have changed their old batteries into new Duracell ones. It has, as I told you, nothing to do with that. They are not interested in us to "use" their batteries: they only wanted us to "see" they were there. And let me tell you, everyone who was there,no matter if they changed their batteries or not,couldn't get rid of Duracell "vision", its real aim. No one escaped from that and my hypocrisy is not bigger than the rest just because I got new batteries in Duracell's "big top". The only way of not being hypocritical was leaving Sonica or blowing up Duracell "nature store". I didn't feel like any of both. Changing batteries was the excuse, Duracell's "visa" to be able to "celebrate nature" with us -besides a great amount of euros, probably-. The batteries itself, were secondary and so, the act of getting them. As I told you, it has only to do with Propaganda. In fact, let's admit it was a great advertising strategy: "We care about nature". How cynical!
See you around!
Didac
Post a Comment